By Julie K. Ward
During this publication, Julie ok. Ward examines Aristotle's notion concerning how language informs our perspectives of what's actual. First she locations Aristotle's idea in its old and philosophical contexts on the subject of Plato and Speusippus. Ward then explores Aristotle's idea of language because it is deployed in different works, together with Ethics, issues, Physics, and Metaphysics, that allows you to reflect on its relation to dialectical perform and clinical rationalization as Aristotle conceived it.
Read Online or Download Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science PDF
Best greek & roman books
Sir Anthony Kenny right here tells the attention-grabbing tale of the beginning of philosophy and its outstanding flourishing within the historic Mediterranean global. this can be the preliminary quantity of a four-book set within which Kenny will spread a magisterial new background of Western philosophy, the 1st significant single-author historical past of philosophy to seem in many years.
This assortment makes to be had in English twelve essays via a exotic French pupil, which give a contribution to the present scholarly and philosophical renewal of curiosity within the significant Hellenistic faculties of philosophy of the Greco-Roman international. the writer makes a speciality of particular difficulties in textual content or interpretation after which enlarges his conclusions to contain a few significant ancient and philosophical concerns.
This article offers an creation to Socrates—both the charismatic, arguable old determine and the basic Socratic philosophy. Written at a starting point yet incorporating contemporary scholarship, The Philosophy of Socrates bargains a number of translations of pertinent passages. As they current those passages, Nicholas Smith and Thomas Brickhouse display why those passages are difficult, survey the interpretive and philosophical concepts, and finish with short defenses in their personal proposed suggestions.
The Charmides is between Plato's such a lot interesting and puzzling dialogues. the variety of matters touched or handled is very broad: issues logical, epistemological, ethical, moral, political, and non secular. in lots of situations, those are mentioned in a hugely inconclusive and aporetic means, specifically in terms of the topic of information.
- Pleasure, knowledge, and being : an analysis of Plato’s Philebus
- Die Töchter des Drachen
- Aristotle's Theology: A Commentary on a Book of the Metaphysics
- The Great Tradition: Further Studies in the Development of Platonism and Early Christianity
- An Islamic Philosophy of Virtuous Religions: Introducing Alfarabi
Additional resources for Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science
1, where Aristotle’s interest is to characterize homonymy and synonymy as ultimately belonging to things, not to words. It may be objected, in turn, that other texts, such as Top. Alpha 15, seem to indicate a linguistic application of homonymy to which the response is that Aristotle has both interests. 32 But this application of homonymy does not preclude that it is also primarily about signifying extralinguistic items. The other, more basic, issue that distinguishes Aristotle’s account from that of Speusippus concerns the difference in the method of classification.
The first concerns the principle that the Forms are the causal source of the characters that we find instantiated in particular things. So, for example, we find: “[I]f anything is beautiful beside the Beautiful itself, it is beautiful for no other reason than it shares in the beautiful, and this applies to everything” (Phd. 100c4–7). 48 Taking these two ideas in conjunction amounts to saying that the Form, the F-itself, brings about the character F in the particulars, but it remains that the Form and the particulars do not possess F in the same way, and so, they are not called “F” univocally.
Meta. 1028a34–36). For example, in the case of the medical, since the medical art is that which Aristotle takes to have the primary application, it follows that in order to define the medical instrument or operation or person, one has to mention the account of the medical art in the accounts of the secondary items (Meta. 1061a4–5). For the art of medicine is that which determines the other items as being medical: a person, or mind, is said to be medical in the sense that he or she comprehends the subject matter of medicine; an instrument is 66 These items are not the same in their type of priority: substance is not prior to the items in the other categories in the same way in which virtue friendship is prior to the secondary kinds of friendship, on which see Owen (1960), Walker (1979), Ferejohn (1980), and Ward (1995).