By Raphael Lataster
For a lay viewers, and with support from historian Richard service, non secular stories pupil Raphael Lataster considers the simplest arguments for and opposed to the lifestyles of the so-called historic Jesus; the Jesus of atheists.
Parts 1 & 2 examine the circumstances made by means of Bart Ehrman and Maurice Casey, who assert that Jesus certainly existed. Their arguments are chanced on to be riddled with blunders, and depending on unreliable, or even non-existing, resources. components three & four speak about the extra sceptical paintings of Lataster and service, who finish that Christianity most likely begun no longer with a humble chippie, yet with 'visions' of a heavenly Messiah.
This intriguing collaboration makes it very transparent why the ancient Jesus will possibly not have existed in spite of everything, and, to these prepared to undertake a commonsensical probabilistic technique, Jesus didn't Exist.
About the Author
Raphael Lataster is a professionally secular PhD researcher on the college of Sydney (Studies in faith) and teaches on faith at numerous associations. His major examine pursuits comprise Philosophy of faith, Christian origins, common sense, Bayesian reasoning, sustainability, and replacement god-concepts similar to pantheism and pandeism. he's additionally an avid rock climber, and is an formally ordained Dudeist priest. Raphael wrote his Master’s thesis on Jesus ahistoricity theories, concluding that old and Bayesian reasoning justifies a sceptical angle in the direction of the ‘Historical Jesus’. For his doctoral paintings, Raphael is analysing the foremost philosophical arguments for God’s lifestyles (as argued by way of William Lane Craig, Richard Swinburne and Thomas Aquinas), makes an attempt to illustrate the logical improbability of theism, explores the theological developments of Philosophy of faith, and considers the plausibility of pantheistic worldviews. Being captivated with schooling, Raphael hopes to proceed instructing in non secular experiences and Philosophy, and makes each attempt to interact with the general public, via well known books, talking engagements, and public debates.