Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume X: 1992 (Oxford by Julia Annas

By Julia Annas

This is often the 10th quantity of the Oxford reports in old Philosophy. individuals contain Martha Nussbaum, Jonathan Barnes and T.H. Irwin.

Show description

Read Online or Download Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume X: 1992 (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy) PDF

Similar greek & roman books

Ancient Philosophy: A New History of Western Philosophy Volume 1 (New History of Western Philosophy)

Sir Anthony Kenny the following tells the attention-grabbing tale of the delivery of philosophy and its striking flourishing within the historic Mediterranean international. this can be the preliminary quantity of a four-book set during which Kenny will spread a magisterial new heritage of Western philosophy, the 1st significant single-author heritage of philosophy to seem in many years.

Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy

This assortment makes to be had in English twelve essays via a individual French pupil, which give a contribution to the present scholarly and philosophical renewal of curiosity within the significant Hellenistic colleges of philosophy of the Greco-Roman international. the writer specializes in particular difficulties in textual content or interpretation after which enlarges his conclusions to contain a few significant old and philosophical matters.

The Philosophy Of Socrates (History of Ancient and Medieval Philosophy)

This article offers an advent to Socrates—both the charismatic, arguable old determine and the basic Socratic philosophy. Written at a starting point yet incorporating contemporary scholarship, The Philosophy of Socrates deals various translations of pertinent passages. As they current those passages, Nicholas Smith and Thomas Brickhouse display why those passages are difficult, survey the interpretive and philosophical recommendations, and finish with short defenses in their personal proposed options.

The Charmides of Plato: Problems and Interpretations

The Charmides is between Plato's such a lot fascinating and complicated dialogues. the diversity of matters touched or handled is intensely extensive: issues logical, epistemological, ethical, moral, political, and non secular. in lots of circumstances, those are mentioned in a hugely inconclusive and aporetic method, specially in terms of the topic of data.

Extra info for Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume X: 1992 (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy)

Sample text

We can also fail to choose to do it. But to fail to choose to do it, given Aristotle’s notion of choice, is not the same as choosing not to do it. We saw this in the case of akrasia. One can choose to follow reason. But if one fails to follow reason and acts on a nonrational desire, it is not because one chooses not to follow reason and, rather, chooses to do something else. So the choice one makes in Aristotle is not, at least necessarily, a choice between doing X and not doing X, let alone a choice between doing X and doing Y.

To say that these nonrational desires have become something quite different in becoming desires of reason is to acknowledge that there is some continuity. To see what the continuity is, we have to look briefly at how the Stoics understand the desires or impulses of other animals. They view them very much as Aristotle does. Animals perceive things. 8 Now, animals also perceive things as pleasant, satisfying, and 36 / The Emergence of a Notion of Will in Stoicism conducive to their maintaining themselves in their natural state or as unpleasant, unsatisfying, or detrimental to their maintenance.

This is how we have come to use the term impression. 12 I take it that he did so because it is quite misleading in the following respect. It is true that we do not actively form an impression, a certain kind of representation of something, in the way in which we paint a painting or draw a map or describe a person. The impression is formed without our doing anything. But this should not obscure the fact that the way the impression is formed reflects the fact that it is formed in and by a mind. This is why the impressions animals form in their souls will differ from one another depending on the kind of animal in which they are formed, and this is why our impressions differ from the impressions of any other animal in having a propositional content, because they are formed in and by a mind or reason.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 24 votes